The former Republican Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin New York Times.
The federal jury ruled after only two hours of deliberation on Tuesday that the New York Times It was not guilty or dragonfly when he falsely linked a mass shooting in 2011 in an editorial he published in 2017. By axios:
Through this test and the original 2022 trial, the Times said that the inaccurate link made in the publishing house was a mistake.
He issued a formal correction of the piece, entitled “LETAL POLICY OF AMERICA”, two days after it was originally published on June 14.
Palin and his legal team argued that the Times and his former editor of the James Bennet editorial page for defamation used “real malice” in the publishing publisher.
TO New York Times The spokesman said in a statement that the jurors’ ruling shows that “editors are not responsible for honest errors.”
“We want to thank jurors for their careful deliberations. The decision reaffirms an important principle of US law: editors are not responsible for honest errors,” said the spokesman.
As Breitbart News reported in February 2022, the American judge Jed S. Rakoff, appointed by Bill Clinton in the Federal Bank in the Southern District of New York, dismissed the case, even the jurors were still deliberating on the verdict:
Palin thirsty Times On a 2017 editorial in which he said he had inspired the mass shooting of 2011 in Tucson, Arizona. Judge Rakoff initially dismissed the case, but was revived by a Federal Court of Appeals. After the presentation of the arguments in the initial movements, Rakoff decided that Palin had enough evidence to allow the case to be trial: a rarity in the demands of defamation for public figures against the media, since the standard of testing “real malice” is usual.
In addition, Rakoff sent the case to the jury after closing arguments last week. But on Monday, as the NPRs David Folkenflik reported, he had doubts and said that Palin did not meet the “real malice” standard due to the TimesCorrection and the then editorial editor of the editor of James Bennet.
The jury ruled against Palin at that time only after he learned of Rakoff’s decision to dismiss the case, which resulted in a panel of three judges of the second circuit, including the two designated people of George W. Bush and a Donald Trumpoin-Regling-Seed need to be measured as the measurement of measures occurred.
The 1964 Supreme Court decision New York Times v. Sullivan Establish a high bar for the Malicia standard, which said that editors cannot be considered responsible for false statements provided they have not been made to know or accountingly.
When leaving the courtroom, Palin said he does not know if he plans to appeal the case.
Paul Roland Bois directed the Awarded Christian Technology Thriller” Copythat has a Critic qualification 100% Rotten Tomatoes And you can see free in YouTube“ TubiWorks Council False TV. “Better than the murderers of the flower moon”, ” Mark Judge wrote. “PORTAS” A story like this before ” Christian Christian Toto. A high quality rental without advertising can also be transmitted Google Play” Vimeo on request“ ORPÍN YouTube movies. Follow it in x @Prooland movies Or Instagram @Prooland movies.
