Legislators press to legalize heavy ‘supersonic aircraft
A bill to repeal the prohibition of supersonic flights on the US could increase the demand for gasoline aircraft from around a boxes to 240
The concord, previously seen as returned to the Intrepid Museum last year, was an advantage in the commercial operation in 2003. Legisalists because to help bring supersonic flights when legalizing it in the United States airspace, since United Airlines and others invest in the Supersonic planning planning startup.
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Climatewire | Legislators on both sides of the Capitol seek to repeal a regulation of half a century that prevents civil planes from traveling faster than the speed of sound over the United States.
The “Supersonic Aviation Modernization Law” could greatly increase the potential market, and emissions, or Boom Supersonic, a planning planning startup backed by United Airlines; Japan Airlines; and Sam Altman, the billionaire CEO of the OpenAi artificial intelligence firm.
Commercial supersonic airplanes have not been operated since the concorde stopped flights between New York and London in 2003. But aviation analysts estimate that the boom of the jets is developing to consume at least twice more new in passengers than flying than flying than flying than flying than flying than flying to fly.
About support for scientific journalism
If you are enjoying this article, consider support our journalism awarded with Subscription. When buying a subscription, it is helping to guarantee the future of shocking stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world today.
The bill is by Senator TED Budd (RN.C.), whose state is the home of the Boom manufacturing plant, and the Troy Nehls representative (R-Texas), the president of the transport and infrastructure subcommittee on aviation. It is co -colored by the Republican sensor Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Mike Lee de Utah and Tim Sheehy or Montana, as well as Democratic representative Sharice Davids or Kansas.
“The supersonic flight without an audible sonic boom must obviously allow,” said Blake Scholl, founder and CEO of Boom, in statements published by the main sponsors of the bill. “I urge Congress to approve the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Law, so we can all enjoy faster flights and maintain US leadership in aviation.”
The legislation would order the Federal Aviation Administration to discard or update a 1973 regulation that prohibits the supersonic flight not related to the military over the United States within a year of the approval of the bill. Ask specifically that the agency allows civil flights in the national airspace “in a MACH number greater than 1, provided that the plane is operated in such a way that no sound tree reaches the ground in the United States.”
The impulse of the Congress to undo the prohibition of flight by land occurs when NASA prepares to carry out its first test flights of a supersonic plane developed by Lockheed Martin to produce sonic “blows”, instead of booms, when traveling faster than the speed of the speed of Anan. The United Nations International Civil Aviation Organization also develops new noise standards that Member States could adopt.
In February, Boom completed a series of supersonic test flights in a prototype plane that said they did not produce sonic auges that were audible from the ground. The speed of sound, or Mach 1, varies according to atmospheric conditions, but is generally around 767 mph at sea level.
The following month, Scholl visited Washington to press Trump administration officials to repeal the supersonic flight prohibition, Politico Pro reported at that time.
The International Council of Transportation Clean, an environmental research group, estimated in 2022 that the elimination of flight prohibitions for supersonic airplanes in the US. UU. And other important markets could increase the demand for gas jets from about a dozen up to 240. The company has already reported agreements with airplanes to produce 130 plans.
Boom is designing its engines to work with sustainable aviation fuel, which has a fraction of carbon emissions from the traditional aircraft fuel. But operating supersonic jets with SAF would not be economical for most airlines given the highest cost of SAF and the highest fuel consumption required to break the sound barrier.
Reprint of E&E news With permission from politician, LLC. Copyright 2025. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.
