Political attacks against libraries endanger the democracy of the small city
Defending our public libraries is part of a greater struggle for the integrity of essential institutions for democracy, writes a rural sociologist
Once they expected to run into the neighbors in the groceries, catch up with the former teachers or share a friendly wave. Now, for some people in small villages, those family faces avoid trigger, they even fear. After seeing a Pilar publication of the “horrible things” on online policy, one of the parents lamented: “Strange when you would be excited to see someone … but now I saw what he published on social networks, and I don’t want to talk to her.” The feeling is not isolated. However, only in places where political tensions are high, the public library is a space where people with various political views can find common land.
Duration The Tense Electoral Season 2020, I set out to investigate the raising of children in a community in northern Apalaches, where 75 percent of residents voted for Donald Trump. A recurring feeling between the parents I interviewed was genuine anger and sadness caused by political conflict in their daily lives and relationships.
Before so deep personal and community fractures, my research study in Rural sociology Points directly to the essential democratic function of our local public libraries. These reliable places are increasingly attacked by extreme partisan efforts to remodel public institutions through financial strangulation and censorship. Defending our public libraries against these attacks is part of a greater struggle for the integrity of essential institutions for democracy.
About support for scientific journalism
If you are enjoying this article, consider support our journalism awarded with Subscription. When buying a subscription, it is helping to guarantee the future of shocking stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world today.
Paradoxically, thesis presses are set up even when libraries enjoy mass public support. Pew Research found that about 90 percent of Americans see them as vital community assets. Surveys for the American Library Association (Wing) showed solid cross majorities, including Republicans, oppose book elimination efforts.
However, public libraries face growing threats to their budgets. In March, President Trump issued an executive order aimed at dismantling the Museum and Library Services Institute (IMLS). As the only federal agency that supports libraries and museums, IMLs subsidies are critical for rural areas with resource problems to maintain programming. The order reflects the broadest efforts to boost public education through K -12 coupons and ideological motivated cuts to university programs. These actions make it more difficult for effective institutions.
Public libraries also face attacks through censorship efforts designed to divide people. Great promoted by organized political groups instead of worried individuals, the wave of prohibitions of unprecedented books since 2021 aims too much to books about the experiences of race, gender and LGBTQ+. The efforts to eliminate specific ideas and perspectives of public access in libraries are based parallel to the legislative thrusts that restrict the history of teaching, careers and gender in K -12 schools and pressures on universities to limit initiatives for diversity and academic freedom. From library shelves to classrooms, censorship limits exposure to various views and restricts the informed commitment to complex social problems.
While these attacks threaten public institutions everywhere, they hurt small rural cities dominated by a single political point of view. With fewer ways (media, cultural organizations or specialized bookstores) to find different perspectives, it becomes significant for FA to Someone To practice the critical thinking skills necessary to issue well reasoned judgments on civic issues. As link doors beyond the Echo Chamber, public libraries provide necessary resources to understand policy proposals or evaluate electoral candidates through open access to government data, legislative records and various media sources. In doing so, libraries equip citizens with skills to counteract misinformation aimed at interrupting democratic processes.
Rural Democrats and other political minorities in my study felt stressed, defeated and, sometimes, directly threatened by their beliefs. The library can offer essential services and a connection with broader resources for these people and other people from various origins or confrontations. Cut relevant funds for these groups or censor materials that reflect your experiences deepen your marginalization and chills.
Simultaneous, the library acts as a natural bridge over the divided of the social class. People often educated in the university who were from the political minority in their city told me that they depended largely on the local university for children’s resources, political activism and validation. His affiliation with the University reinforced what some perceived as a division of “Haves Vs. Have-No-Nom”, since other residents of the city felt excluded from university resources. The public library served as a place where everyone felt comfortable. Some community members were based on digital tools and the development of workforce and professional services, while others gravitated towards the cultural and intellectual survey. Sharing public space creates opportunities for positive interactions through political and class lines so that they increase empathy and strengthen the identity of the shared community. Public libraries are, in this way, great equalizers.
Defending public libraries against financial and censorship threats is necessary to preserve social cohesion, intellectual freedom and the foundations of democracy in vulnerable rural communities. The wing urges everyone to contact its federal legislators to revoke the Executive Order of IMLS. The organization also suggests that people share personal stories, write local editors and groups of forms to take measures. In small villages, where social relations and mutual dependence are important, the collapse of trust and intensification of the division is partially harmful. We need our libraries and need us.
This is an opinion and analysis article, and the opinions expressed by the author or authors are only theirs and not those of any organization with which those of O American scientist.
