Loneliness is inflaming our bodies, and our policy
Medical research shows that social isolation is a serious chronic stressful. You can say something similar about its impact on our political system.
Eugene Mymrin/Getty Images
Hannah Arendt has been in my mind a lot with pleasure. The German Jewish political philosopher of the twentieth century escaped the Nazi Holocaust, and considered one of the world’s largest public intellectuals at the time that women were named for university faculties. It was launched on history, literature and its own life to identify the conditions under which open and liberal societies become authoritarian states. Seven decades ago he made observations that still sacrifice powerful ideas today.
In The origins of totalitarianismArendtMphatized a main factor in the emergence of authoritarianism that has little obvious connection with politics: loneliness. While we generally think of solitude such as not having our social needs, Arendt defined the word as something deeper. Loneliness occurs when there are no shared objectives or possible collective action to solve shared challenges. It is a state of being where you cannot trust others. The loneliness, in the Arendt count, inflames the connective tissues of a society. Loot the political body so that demagogues and despotes can take advantage. “What prepares men for totalitarian domination,” he wrote, “… is the fact that loneliness, once a borderline experience suffered in certain marginal social conditions such as old age, has become a daily experience.”
Arendt, which I know, did not use the word “inflammation” to describe the effects of social isolation in a country or culture. But it is the metaphor that, for me, reaches the essence of its warning.
About support for scientific journalism
If you are enjoying this article, consider support our journalism awarded with Subscription. When buying a subscription, it is helping to guarantee the future of shocking stories about the discoveries and ideas that shape our world today.
Inflammation is the body’s response to a sensation of threat, a protective and contractive response that can extend even to the cellular level. It is an answer that can inhibit healing. A community or society that faces a significant deficit or connection is similar in a state of perpetual threat; People cannot listen to each other, trust each other, maintain confidence in shared institutions or collectively overcome divisions.
This may sound familiar.
From 2003 to 2022, socialization face to face among American men fell by 30 percent. For teenagers, it was an intern of 45 percent. It is estimated that 12 percent of Americans report that they do not have close friends, an increase of four times since 1990. While social networks were supposed to amplify the human connection, the emergence of comparative culture, the cohamers of the social status of the equipment and the ingenuity in the work of the levels of anxiety, depression and unprecedented districts.
Therefore, we should not surprise us that, in the United States, we are seeing democratic setback such as Hannah Arendt warned that including mass polarization, intentional disinformation and a policy of fear, remuneration and anger.
Loneliness inflames societies.
It happens that loneliness also inflates the body.
Two decades ago, researchers Louise Hawkley and John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago demonstrated in a historical study as a chronic stressful that triggers the body’s innate response systems. Social isolation maintains the hypothalamic-political-adrenal (HPA) axis in a constant state of excitement, which drives the persistent liberation of cortisol. This hormonal imbalance is inflammation. And this can, in turn, the immune system, compromise cardiovascular health and worsen vulnerability to mental health conditions such as depression and anxiety. In summary, the absence of significant social ties can literally emphasize the physiological mechanisms of the body towards greater stress and disease.
Around the last two decades, more studies have only reinforced the link between loneliness and inflammatory pathways. George Slavich of the University of California, Los Angeles, emphasizes that experiencing social disconnection can imitate the physical threats in how our brains and immune systems respond, which increases the release of inflammatory agents. From an evolutionary point of view, sustained isolation interrupts our primary need for social integration, which leads to a large amount of downstream consequences.
It is easy to minimize the problem of loneliness. When former American surgeon General Vivek Murthy warned about the dangers of social isolation and proposes solutions, there were no significant government interventions. Similarly, when the United Kingdom government appointed a Minister of Soledad in 2018, many compared the transfer to a sketch of Monty Python instead of seeing a serious political intervention.
But medical, social and equal political costs of growing social isolation mean that we can no longer allow ourselves to ignore it.
Some solutions are simple. Medical innovatives are now addressing social isolation through practices such as “social prescription”, where health professionals connect patients who are alone with non -medical community services, Volmunter programs, groups and artistic activities. Instead of writing recipes for pills, doctors can prescribe a free pass to a museum, an invitation to join a gardening club or a support group for people who face similar struggles. A recent evaluation of several years of the social prescription oriented to nature in the United Kingdom found that programs significantly helped particles reduce anxiety and improve happiness.
Other solutions are more systemic. When Pete Buttigieg run for president in 2020, he presented an agenda for “belonging and healing”, emphasizing new funds and policies around mental health and addiction, as well as the national service to rebuild community institutions and promote environmental restoration. Leaders must propose to climb the “membership infrastructure”, Transit, green spaces, cultural places and mental health centers, while national service programs promoted by a purpose such as Americans and invest in local journalism through publication through important foundations of community life are expanded.
This should be a bipartisan cause. Both conservatives and liberals have an opening to address the crisis through hepatic faith and veteran groups, for fortress, grant tax incentives or small federal items that could help churches, synagogues and veterans initiatives of the initiative initiative of parks, libraries and civic spaces. There is also a growing bipartisan recognition of the role of social networks in the crisis. When addressing the impact of Big Tech on young people, leaders of the entire ideological spectrum should promote complete algorithmic transparency, restrictions on exploitation design characteristics and solid digital welcome protections mandates for children.
Like the inflammation in the body, the social isolation weakens our civic “immune system”, feeding the poliazation and becoming more susceptible to authoritarian impulses. But Hannah Arendt emphasized that the condition is reversible. By investing in the foundations of shared belonging, we can restore our adaptation to adapt to the challenges we face, from forest fires to pandemics to erroneous information. It is time to take our healing seriously.
This is an opinion and analysis article, and the opinions expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of American scientist.
