Prince Harry has affirmed that he was “indicated for a lower treatment” after he was stripped of his security protection financed by taxpayers in the United Kingdom.
The Duke of Sussex, 40, arrived at the Superior Court of London on Tuesday for the beginning of a two -day appeal to recover publicly financed security details for him and his family.
Speaking in the Court, Harry’s lawyer, Shaheed Fatima KC, said that the old Royal who worked had been “highlighted for a different, unjustified and lower treatment.”
Harry complained not to feel safe enough to return to his homeland with his wife, Meghan Markle, and his two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, because it is too dangerous. “
Duke’s lawyers added that the United Kingdom’s treatment was “illegal and unfair” and warned “the impact on the United Kingdom reputation of a successful attack” against him.
Harry’s legal team also mentioned the failed intention of the Duke to hire armed bodyguards of the London Metropolitan Police in his own penny, a request that was rejected last year.
Harry refused to respond when asked if he had recently spoken to his father, who today went to Italy with his wife, Queen Camilla, for a four -day diplomatic trip to Italy.
The case of the founder of Invictus Games will be heard in front of three judges on Tuesday and Wednesday.
The majority of Harry’s appeal will be heard in public, although some parts will be built to protect the “confidential evidence”, in accordance with an order of the Court of Appeals issued on April 1.
The publication has communicated with Harry’s representatives to comment.
Harry landed in London on Tuesday only a few hours before his father separated and affected by cancer moved away from Italy with Camilla.
It is understood that the father-son duo did not see his overlap of 3 hours in the British soil.
On his way to the Court, the Duke appeared in a good mood while greeted fans who covered the streets in anticipation of his arrival.
Harry traveled only for the audience of his luxury path in Montecito, California.
In February 2024, the Superior Court of London ruled to strip the United Kingdom Security Protection Sussexes financed by taxpayers.
The father of two children was ordered to pay 90% of the legal costs of the United Kingdom Ministry for defending the initial ruling of the court.
Sir Peter Lane, the judge of the Superior Court, ruled that there was no illegality to strip Harry and Meghan of his security in February 2020.
After the ruling, Harry has made his mission to recover the security details for him and his family, but has not received zero help from the real ones.
Harry has argued that his children cannot “feel at home” or “safe” in the United Kingdom without the comfort of personal police protection.
The Duke’s argument was played by a judge, who said that the level of his security protection had changed according to that he was no longer a “member of the real family full time.”
The appearance in Harry’s room occurred only a few hours after his wife launched the first episode of his new “Confessions of a Female Founder” podcast.
In the episode, the “Suits” student, 43, opened about his “terrifying” experience with postpartum preeclampsia during a conversation with her friend and founder of appointment applications Bumble Whitney Wolfe Herd.
