Send your letter to the editor through this form. Read more letters to the editor.
New Republican Party leader
Has its head in sand
Re: “First black woman to lead the California Republican Party ready to face the Democrats” (page A, April 6).
If the truth is said enough, people could believe it.
President Trump is not a businessman, as says Corrin Rankin, head of the California Republican Party. You can do your own research and search Google these six Trump companies that declared bankruptcy: Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Plaza Hotel, Plaza Hotel, Trump Hotels and Resorts, Trump Entertainment Resorts and Trump Castle Hotel and Casino. People could look for “President Trump had no six bankruptcies”, and they would not find any alternative fact to support that premise, no matter how much they tried. Six bankruptcy do not make a good businessman, and it should be something that everyone agrees.
At this time, we headed towards its seventh: the United States of America, and with fear, the world economy. Let’s keep hitting the pavement with the truth.
Lisa Rigge
Pleasant
Trump’s detractors are
Be bad Americans
I voted for Donald Trump twice, although something reluctant. However, I thought he was a good president in politics in general. After 2020, however, I picked up for God to replace it.
He knew that if Trump ever returned to the president again, then the total effort to tear him down would resume immediately. But I ask those of you to support this: how can they be considered good Democrats when you refuse to accept the legitimacy of a democratically elected president, regardless of how much you do not agree with him or hate him?
Since 2016, I have attended several houses attached to local representatives of the house, and all were nothing more than anti-trump demonstrations. This is wrong, people.
President Trump is boldly doing what more than 77 million of us chooses to do, believing that he is trying to do the best for our nation. If you can’t accept this, I’m sorry, but you’re not acting as good Americans.
Christopher Andrus
Dublin
The column does not do
Your point in rates
Re: “How tariffs destroy what makes the United States great” (page 7, April 4).
David Brooks tries to explain how Trump’s tariffs are something bad without even suggesting why it is unfair that other countries impose higher rates for goods than the United States than the United States imposes on their own.
Brooks feels that the current rates system results in people who “are excited about novelty … They are several curiosity … they have a social range … combine disparate worldviews … [and] They are led to continuous growth. “While those are good things to have, we are the richest country in the world and we have a cataclysmic deficit.
Brooks does not explain why their subtleties would disappear if the tariffs become fair. Maybe Brooks should ask: if doing another fair country is what is required for the United States to be great, what does that say about the United States?
Daniel Mauthe
Lemmore
Trump dishonors
Soldiers Memory
In the midst of the “release day” of President Trump, the collapse of the $ 6 billion stock market of $ 6, the dismissal of intelligence personnel at the request of a right -wing activist and a commercial application to discuss, another article escaped from the holders.
After a search for days, the bodies of four army military disappeared in an NATO training exercise were recovered in Lithuania. As their Oyas passed through the Lithuanian capital, the streets were full of civilians, a number crying, with American and Lithuanian flags. Lithuanian troops greeted our soldiers while praying their last trip home.
Despite the agitation created by the Trump administration with European allies, respect remains for the United States and the sacrifices of our military.
And where was President Trump for the transfer of the coffins covered with flag? He chose to join a LIV golf tournament supported by Saudi, showing a very different son of commitment.
Jim Cervantes
Lafayette
The voter identification rules are
Ineffective, unnecessary
Re: “Save Act claims to solve a big problem that does not exist” (page A8, April 6).
The voting identification laws that are promulgated in many states are so unnecessary. We already have an identification in each vote. Your signature is called.
The firm is verified by the voter registrar. When people register to vote, they swore that they are citizens, they live in their direction and are the right age. The firm legalizes the document.
Why do we need more identification laws? Laws will not make people more reliable.
Margot Smith
Berkeley
