If becoming a spy sounds like an exciting way of living as a character of Le Carré, let this new affair of Spy Keith O’Brien confess that Keith O’Brien serves as a warning.
On Friday, an Irish judge granted O’Brien a restriction order against several men who have not yet identified their legs, according to the judicial order so in Techcrunch. O’Brien testified that multiple men two in an excellent gray skoda on one occasion, and more often, a man with short and heavy hair in a black SUV, sometimes accompanied by a great dog that was heading repeatedly followed his car and watched the home.
O’Brien’s story has captured the imagination of the technological industry after its colorful confession in April, in which it was a spy for part. He said they paid € 5,000 per month to steal the internal data of Rippleing, above all, from products to customers. Rippleing caught him by configuring a Honeypot slack channel. The day he was caught, O’Brien pretended to throw his phone through the corporate bath and then broke it, dropping pieces from the drain in his mother -in -law’s house, according to his affidavit.
Now he is the star witness of Ondular in his lawsuit against part. Rippleing is only collecting the tab for their legal and related doors, they testified their lawyers. Part is also counteract waves, claiming that it was also spied, by an undulating employee who passes through a client. The two human resources technological companies have bitter rivals for years after the part, once a undulating customer began offering competitive products.
In the last part of the saga, O’Brien testified that he tried to lose the black SUV after his car making sudden twists and taking indirect ways to get home, just to see him traveler in his rearview mirror. He hired a security consulting company and feared someone being placed tracking devices in his car.
O’Brien states that all these incidents have created “emotional and psychological” damage to them and their wife. “We have experienced anxiety at home and in public. It has affected our dream and our concentration,” O’Brien said in his last affidavit. They fear for the safety of their four children.
He and his lawyer speculated that this was intended for harassment of his role as a star witness. However, O’Brien’s lawyer also admitted in court that they had no evidence to link men to share. Share also denied knowing something about man in the black SUV.
According to the Irish Publication Business Post, when granting the court order, the judge apparently said: “As if they were on a television program of police and thieves in the 70s.”
Whatever happens in the cases of the Duel Court, O’Brien has become the rope in a bitter pull of the war between these two well -financed human resources startups. And from what he says in his testimony, he sounds painful.
