On Sunday in the former governor “This Week” of ABC, Chris Christie (R-NJ), he suggested that the ruling of the Supreme Court that a president is immune to the prosecution when exercising the central powers of the office could help Judge Hannah Dugan, who was accused of obstruction and concealment.
The presenter Martha Raddatz said: “Let’s talk about Wisconsin and what happened in that courtroom. You are a former prosecutor, would you have filed charges against that judge?”
Christie Said, “Well, I’ll Tell You, Martha, This is one of echose situations where Everybody, I Think, Is acting Badly. So, First Off, You Know, I Down’s Know What This Judge Was Thinking In The Ters Or Trendant A Trendant A Trendant A Chrominal A Chrominal Defandant A Crominal Defandant to Chrominal Defandant a Chrominal Defandant to Chrominal Defandant a Chrominal Defandant a Chrominal Defandant to Chrominal Defandant a Chrominal Defandant to Chrominal Defendant to chromal authorities, and, you know, it is not a typical judicial action in my experience, it is not something that a judge is normal, when I arrive, I do not know that the template was filled out, you already He ended up in a public court near public elevators after he left the shore and was seen from the agents who were there to help in the apprehension.
The former Juctice spokesman, Sarah Isgur, said: “They have a problem because she is a judge. Now no court has found that the judges are immune to criminal prosecution, but the last last last time of Wekp.
Christie said: “The decision of Trump’s immunity decision for this administration can give and take here because, you know, giving that son of broad immunity to the president, he may be sure that the judge’s lawyers will argue that a judge has the right to similar.”
Follow Pam Key in X @Pamkeynen
