The Trump Administration has ordered scientists from the National Health Institutes (NIH) to study the dark side of the gender transition, according to a directive directive to two media.
“Two current NIH employees, who did not want to be identified for fear of compensation,” the board first raised for the first time Nature A week ago. This week, NPR also has its hands on the Memo.
According to reports, the memo is from the interim director of NIH, Matthew Mempo. “It establishes that NIH must study the impact of the” social transition and/or chemical and surgical mutilation “among children who make the transition,” Npr. “Specifically, the White House wants the NIH to study” repentance “and” detransition “between children and adults who have made the transition.”
“This is very important for the president and the secretary,” says the memorandum, which refers to President Trump and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., adds: “He would like us to have announcements of funds in the next six months to move.”
Look – “That’s not right!” Nancy Mace doubles against trans people in women’s baths:
“Doversion research is very useful, it is a very important area,” said Michael Biggs, associate professor of Sociology at Oxford University, an academic who does not oppose the idea. “This is a population below the study to collect systematic data.”
The scope of the project, its design, that the researchers will carry it out, and how it will be founded yet, but, according to the reports, it is in planning.
The predictable news caused fire of some researchers and segments of the LGBTQ+community. Adrian Shanker, who served as Deputy Secretary of Health Policy in HHS under President Biden, criticized the proposal to NPR.
“What they are looking for is a political, not scientific response,” he said. “That should be an alarm for all those who care about the scientific integrity of national health institutions.”
Harry Barbee, assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, intervened, exploiting the language of the board:
Chemical or surgical mutilation? These are deeply offensive terms. … This terminology does not take place in serious scientific or public health discourse. Language has historically used to stigmatize trans people. Even the phrase[s] ‘Repentance’ and ‘Detansion’ can be armed.
Lindsey Dawson, who directs the LGBTQ health policy in KFF, previously the Kaiser Family Foundation, argued that the “regret rates” were “less than one percent”, claiming that the rate was less than the common hip replacements. “
Other researchers argue that “previous research on trans repentance and related problems have become bad and outdated,” NPR said. ABBRZZEE Evgenia, co -founder of Gender Medicine based on the evidence of the group, told NPR: “We are beginning to see many of the young people who are seeing that on the wrong path for them and that Astir Aspy to the left Aspy Astir Aspy Lojada Aspy Aspy Aspy the conversational conversational were left.”
“There are many negative impacts of the transition. And repentance is definitely one of them. It is a very important medicine area to study,” Abbruzsese concluded.
Lowell Cauffiel taxpayer is the best selling author of Under the line and nine other criminal novels and non -fiction titles. See Lowellcauffiel.com For more.
